Creating Concept Quizzes

In my journey on the road to having a standards based classroom, one aspect I am really trying to improve is assessment.

Obviously, assessment is a HUGE part of SBG. My challenge comes with trying to determine the best way to assess my students in a way that accurately reflects their understanding.

When I made my mid-year switch to an SBG system, my first assessments looked an awful lot like my old assessments. I knew I wanted to start sorting the quizzes into concepts, but hadn't thought much past that point. I still had a jumble of questions and when it came time for grading, I wasn't really clear on what would earn somebody a 2 versus a 4. I was giving 4's to students who answered everything correctly, 3's for students who answered mostly everything correctly, 2's for students who answered some things correctly, and 1's for almost all wrong answers. Students got a level 0 for leaving a question blank. The problem here is that it's really still just a traditional grading system with a nice SBG mask on.

I went back to look at some of Dan Meyer's sample quizzes to see how he organized them. Dan's post was what originally sparked my interest in SBG. He seemed to have very clear cut problems that would demonstrate the students' understanding of the topic. My initial thoughts about his problems were that they were very procedural, and that I wanted my students to be able to do more complex problems. I decided to give it a go, and continued sectioning quizzes by concept and giving these straight-forward problems. My grading remained pretty much the same: 4's for correct solving, 3's for minor mistakes, 2's for major, etc. I still didn't feel like I was doing justice to a true SBG system.



So, I turned back to the levels themselves. Marzano talks about these 4 levels of understanding as the basis for labeling understanding of a concept so why wasn't I using these?

After talking about this a lot with some colleagues, I thought why not make the levels as obvious as possible within the assessment? I decided to try having questions separated by level. Based on Marzano's 4 levels, I wanted the Level 3 question to demonstrate the concept itself. I started there, and then simplified this for Level 2, and made it more complex for Level 4. Here's an example of a quiz on the number of solutions to an equation.


This was actually a reassessment that I gave for this topic. Here enters my next challenge. The previous Level 3 question for this quiz was the following: 

"Adele opens an account with $100 and deposits $35 a month. Kent opens an account with $50 and also deposits $35 a month. Will they have the same amount in their accounts at any point? IF so, in how many months and how much will be in each account? Explain. "

While I prefer this problem over the purely procedural problems in the example, I found that many students did not solve this question correctly simply because they did not understand how to change the word problem into an equation (side note: this is something I plan to work on for the first couple weeks of school in the future). This system also streamlined my grading process. If a student can do Level 2 and 3, but not 4, then they get a 3. If they can do 2 and 3 and a bit of 4 correctly, they might earn a 3.5. Occasionally a student will not correctly do Level 2, but will get Level 3. This is usually a misunderstanding of the L2 question, in which case I will ask them in person and clear it up. It could also be that the questions themselves are not leveled properly, in which case I make a note to change in the future. Here is a concept quiz I gave a few weeks ago to 7th grade. It has 2 concepts: Cross Sections and Angle Relationships (I would also like to be more on top of giving 1 concept quizzes more frequently). 



So, as of right now, here are my steps for developing questions for level 2,3, and 4. It's kind of a blend of Marzano's levels of understanding and Webb's Depth of Knowledge.  For the past couple assessments, I have created the leveled questions based on the ideas below. Moving forward, I would like to look more into Webb's DOK and maybe try to make them more aligned.

LEVEL 2
Simple content. Demonstrates some understanding of the concept. I usually put forced answer questions here (multiple choice, true or false, matching, etc.).

LEVEL 3
What do I want them to be able to do? The problem then becomes the answer to this question. 

LEVEL 4
Level 4 needs to have the students understand the concept and extend it. I usually go for a error analysis, create a problem, or conceptual thinking question here. 

I definitely intend to continue tweaking these quizzes to find out what works best, but I would love to hear from you! 

How do you make assessments? Any ideas on how to better make assessment more clearly SBG-linked? 

SBG Posters

As I continue to implement Standards Based Grading in my classroom, I've been looking for my resources for students to help them understand the system.

I found these wonderful posters at "Everybody Is A Genius" blog, but they didn't really work with my own system. I am trying to stick to Marzano's philosophy of a 4-point scale, where 3 represents meeting the standard and 4 represents going beyond the standard. I like this idea because it encourages and challenges students to exceed the standard.

So, I took Sarah's posters and tweaked them to fit my system. I changed the level scale to a 4-point scale, and reworded the descriptions.


I also made a minor tweak to the process poster: adding an arrow from "Quiz on the Skill" to "Demonstrate Mastery" because after all, the ideal situation would be for students to master the skill the first time around! 


Big thanks again to Sarah at "Everybody is a Genius" for the inspiration! 




My Educational Epiphany: Standards Based Grading

I've recently had a complete educational epiphany.

4 days ago, I was perusing the always interesting words of the great Dan Meyer when I came across this post.

Standards. Based. Grading.



Now, I know that SBG is nothing new.... but, it's new to me.

Since I stumbled across that post, I have been obsessively consuming everything I possibly can about SBG from Shawn Cornelly, Jason BuellRick Wormeli, Matt Townsley, Sam Shah.....

I CAN'T STOP.



Now, my current struggle is this: It's the end of February. I have essentially 3 months left. I can't just 180 my classroom right now without students and parents having complete mental breakdowns (all the while I'm yelling at them, "No! Trust me! This is better! I've been screwing it up all along!) 

So what changes can I make now to start walking down the path of enlightenment?

Here's what I've come up with so far:
  1. Make a concept checklist for the standards I have yet to cover this year.
  2. Start chunking any quizzes/tests into the concepts and record the students' progress on these specific concepts, but still record a holistic test grade in the gradebook (boo, I know.)
  3. Allow "re-dos" of missed concepts on assessments for full credit. Now, I already allow students to correct any questions they got wrong along with an explanation of why they got it wrong the first go around for half credit, so this is a minor tweak. 
  4. Assign less homework. 1 or 2 problems (once again, a la Dan Meyer). Hopefully this will encourage students to think "Hey, I can stomach one measly problem." And if they don't, so be it. They're no worse off than they were for not having done the 20 problem homework assignment. 
  5.  Change all 0's in my gradebook to 50's so that they are recoverable. In the words of Rick Wormeli, "I shall not be a rim waver!"
It kills me that I can't go full blown SBG right now. I can't believe I missed out on this whole beautiful world up until now, and I cannot wait to begin.